Read my latest article: Was away on vacation (posted Sun, 11 May 2008 22:33:00 GMT)

Review: FogBugz, part 1 4

Posted by Robby Russell Tue, 01 Jan 2008 21:43:00 GMT

Today, I thought that I’d give FogBugz a quick trial. A few of our Rails consulting clients use it and I’m hearing that others are as well.

Along the way, I’m bringing one of my favorite tools so that I can share some things thoughts (visually) along the way.

Signing up for a free trial

My first impression of FogBugz was, “nice homepage design… but what is that screenshot of?”

I’m not a designer, but the interface in the screenshot isn’t jumping out to me as something that you’d expect to see in a modern web application. While I appreciate the default browser colors for links (this is really important)... I think they could have found a better way to distinguish which bug links you’ve previously viewed. It’s very likely that you’ll most bugs many times, so having the color be different might not make sense in the same way it would when reading content on a web site. Again, I’m not a designer and I’d be curious to hear from a designer on this. Just something that I initially thought.

Okay, this sign up form seems really easy to start with. I’m used to free trials being really simple to get going. So, I enter in my sub-domain selection and provide my email address on the following page so that they can confirm that I’m legit.

(several minutes later…)

Okay, this process required me to jump from my browser to my email to my browser back to my email and then back again to my browser. It’s really frustrating for an application to force me to go back and forth between my browser and email client. I think the initial email is something I can cope with, but I found it a bit silly to have to wait for another email to receive a link to login to my new account, especially considering I already knew the URL as that was the first thing that I provided. The application could have provided the link (or redirected me) to the following form, which I had a few things to comment on.

At first glance, this might not seem like much… but I’m becoming more and more disappointed by the choice of language that we’re using in applications. First of all, this is the first time that I’ve seen this page. I’m not changing my password… what you’re really asking me to do is, “Create (or set) a password.” There are other verbs that you could use here, but change really isn’t appropriate. Also, choose doesn’t work here either.


  chose; choos·ing.
  –verb (used with object)
  1.    to select from a number of possibilities; pick by preference:  

What am I choosing from? Again, you’re asking me to create a new password.. not change one and definitely not choose one, unless you’re implying that I should choose one from a collection of ones that I already use.

One might argue that we can make an assumption about what they mean, but it’s simple problems like this that can seriously confuse people that use the software we design and develop. As people interact with minor problems like this, their perception of the software as being helpful and friendly… can quickly deteriorate.

Okay, so that was my first several minutes of getting into my new FogBugz account.

Coming soon… Robby will share his thoughts on managing bugs with FogBugz.

Subscribe to my RSS feed Enjoying the content? Be sure to subscribe to my RSS feed.
Comments

Leave a response

  1. Avatar
    Ted Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:50:00 GMT

    “I think they could have found a better way to distinguish which bug links you’ve previously viewed. It’s very likely that you’ll most bugs many times, so having the color be different might not make sense”

    The link changes from purple (visited) back to blue (unvisited) if the ticket is updated since the last time you read it. Joel has a pretty good video (somewhere, sorry I don’t have the link handy) where he demos and walks through the tool.

  2. Avatar
    Michael Christenson II Sat, 05 Jan 2008 05:46:19 GMT

    Having used Fogbugz professionally, I’d say your in for a lot more disappointments. This is follows the Microsoft style of UI. :(

  3. Avatar
    Raymond Brigleb Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:46:10 GMT

    Robby, you still using FogBugz? I found it daunting myself and, being a designer, simply ugly. So I’m still using Trac. But I wondered if you had any more insights to share, since this product seems to be “the king.”

  4. Avatar
    James Urquhart Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:30:10 GMT

    Yikes! Looks a bit on the ugly side. Though i guess looks aren’t everything, it might be great to use for all i know.

    Personally for my project management needs i use RailsCollab, because i made it and thus want to eat my own dog food, so to speak. :)

    (Though it doesn’t explicitly do bug tracking or wiki’s, so i have to use other tools for those)

Share your thoughts... (really...I want to hear them)

Comments