<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheets/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Robby on Rails: The Technology of Dialogue</title>
    <link>http://www.robbyonrails.com/articles/2006/09/12/the-technology-of-dialogue</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>thoughts.sort_by{|t| t[:topic]}.collect </description>
    <item>
      <title>The Technology of Dialogue</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the essay, &lt;a href="http://www.vision-nest.com/cbw/Dialogue.html"&gt;Dialogue and Organizational Transformation&lt;/a&gt;, Glenna Gerard and Linda Teurfs outline the the &lt;em&gt;building blocks&lt;/em&gt; of &lt;a href="http://www.vision-nest.com/cbw/Dialogue.html#3"&gt;&lt;span class="caps"&gt;THE TECHNOLOGY OF DIALOGUE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, which they suggests consists of:&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Suspension of Judgment&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;Identification of Assumptions&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;Listening&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;Inquiry and Reflection&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;What makes dialogue different than conversation? According to &lt;a href="http://www.gurteen.com/"&gt;David Gurteen&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;em&gt;&amp;#8220;dialogue is a disciplined form of conversation.&amp;#8221;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Gurteen says that within dialogue&lt;sup&gt;&lt;a href="#fn1"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;You prefer a certain position but do not cling to it. &lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;You are ready to listen to others.&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;Your mindset is not one of &amp;#8216;convincing others that your way is right&amp;#8217; but of asking what you can learn from them.&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;It is recognizing that other people’s input will help you refine your own ideas or reveal your misconceptions.&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;It is not argument or debate. It is not win-lose. In dialogue all sides win by coming up with a more appropriate solution than a single person could ever have. It is win-win.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;When we first introduced Dialogue-Driven Development, Ryan Allen &lt;a href="http://www.robbyonrails.com/articles/2006/08/02/dialogue-driven-development#comment-21737"&gt;responded with a brief overview&lt;/a&gt; of how you might go about defining a &lt;em&gt;failed project&lt;/em&gt;. His first bullet was, &lt;em&gt;&amp;#8220;Miscommunication can lead to the implementation of the wrong solutions.&amp;#8221;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;It is our opinion that many of the problems that lead to &lt;em&gt;failed projects&lt;/em&gt; can be solved through consistent and cooperative discourse. Much of this relies on each of us taking ownership of our commitment to encouraging healthy collaboration between developers, clients, and users.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Wikipedia &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialogue"&gt;currently describes dialogue&lt;/a&gt; as, &lt;em&gt;&amp;#8220;a reciprocal conversation between two or more persons.&amp;#8221;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;h3&gt;Question&lt;/h3&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;What are some of the obstacles that you face when interacting with a diverse set of developers, clients, and users?&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p id="fn1"&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.gurteen.com/gurteen/gurteen.nsf/id/km-dialogue"&gt;The Discipline of Dialogue by David Gurteen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:30:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:dbe5da89-c979-4086-8129-4673665ba5a6</guid>
      <author>Robby Russell</author>
      <link>http://www.robbyonrails.com/articles/2006/09/12/the-technology-of-dialogue</link>
      <category>d3</category>
      <category>d3</category>
      <category>agile</category>
      <category>dialogue</category>
      <category>clients</category>
      <category>gurteen</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
